7
« on: September 25, 2024, 07:57:42 pm »
It is important to remember that the ideal situation is with efficiency of travel, not merely the absence of travel.
Efficiency is not relegated to one aspect of travel, such as fuel efficiency or amount of materials moved. Efficiency must be gauged in all aspects including the carbon footprint of how the vehicle was created, the amount of pollution caused by the vehicle during normal operation & the carbon footprint for creating the energy needed for the vehicle to operate.
The Covid pandemic has forced society, at least for a brief while, in imagining an otherwise unthinkable scenario in terms of travel efficiency on a macro level. It demonstrated that environmental benefits from reduced travel could be witnessed at significant levels and in the short-term.
Should society desire it (and it should), we should take that lesson and expand upon it to its reasonable conclusions.
Mass transit is an inescapable extension of the lesson learned from the initial phase of the Covid pandemic. Reducing motorized individual transportation, regardless of energy source, should be a priority of all civilizations. Reduction is not elimination; We must be pragmatic in our goals to be more efficient.
An increase in non-motorized transportation (ie bicycles, tricycles, and the like) is another desirable goal. It is important to note that society needs to be attentive in how such modes of transportation are constructed; Construction with exotic materials inevitably creates a larger carbon footprint.
Our sources of energy should be varied. While it would be highly desirable to eliminate coal, petroleum & natural gas, such an objective is not feasible in the short term. What is more pragmatic would be significant reductions of these types of energy sources.
Nuclear energy must be part of our carbon footprint reduction plan. Although politically undesirable, we must acknowledge that modern nuclear power plants are far safer and efficient than plants constructed in the 1970s and 1980s. Granted, nuclear energy should not dominate our energy resource plan but we must be willing to commit to it if we are serious in lowering our carbon footprint. As much as solar & wind would benefit us, they are still too inefficient to power our nation alone.
We must also address hydro-electric. This form of energy needs to be reduced as our planet now has so many hydro-electric dams that it has affected the spin of our planet through the unnatural displacement of water. Hydro-electric power is not as ecologically-friendly as once presumed and we must acknowledge this fact.
Although I am hopeful that society will eventually arrive at more efficient travel, it will likely not occur until more calamities happen. The arc of our progress always tends to be that society needs great crises before significant action of any kind occurs.